first the dot line on chinese maps lost two of its hyphens in 1952, when, in a consequence of socialistic affability with Vietnam, Chairman Mao Zedong abandoned taiwanese claims to the Gulf of Tonkin. then, on July 12, 2016, an external court ruled that the now nine-dash line could not be used by Beijing to make historic claims to the South China Sea, parts of which are claimed by six governments. The line, beginning inscribed on a chinese map in 1947, had “ no legal footing ” for maritime claims, deemed the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague. Beijing reacted with scandal to the judgment, which delegitimized China ’ mho nautical ambitions according to international police .
On July 18, China ’ s naval foreman Wu Shengli told the visiting U.S. chief of naval operations that Beijing would not halt its controversial political campaign to turn the contest South China Sea reefs it controls into artificial islands complete with military-ready airstrips. China “ will never give up halfway ” on its island-building efforts, said Wu, according to chinese state media. besides on Monday, the Chinese air wedge announced that it had sent bombers on “ normal struggle patrols ” over Scarborough Shoal, a disputed reef that Beijing efficaciously seized from Manila in 2012. Analysts worry that China could next build on Scarborough Shoal, placing a militarized Chinese island off the Philippine seashore. Far from hewing to the international court ’ south July 12 judgment on the nine-dash line, and contested features within that boundary, Beijing has made clear it considers the award null and nothingness.
Wang Ying, a chinese nautical geographer, besides feels aggrieved by the court ’ second award. “ They didn ’ t deference history, ” she says, of the international woo. “ I wholly agree with the answer of our government. ” The 81-year-old member of the esteemed taiwanese Academy of Sciences is the disciple of Yang Huairen, a chinese geographer who, in 1947, helped etch the U-shaped, 11-dash telephone line on chinese maps to demarcate roughly 90 % of the contested South China Sea for his fatherland. “ All the lines have a scientific basis, ” says Wang, who distillery teaches at Nanjing University in easterly China. “ I ’ m a scientist, not person in politics. ” Although the phrase nine-dash line is used normally outside of China — to the point where an external arbitration court was asked by the Philippines to adjudicate on its legality — the words rarely appear in official chinese media. research by David Bandurski of the China Media Project in Hong Kong found that through July 12, the phrase was lone used in six articles in the People ’ sulfur Daily, the mouthpiece of the ruling Chinese Communist Party. After the court ’ s judgment was made, state media began a campaign to defend China ’ randomness nautical claims, encapsulated by the phrase “ not one [ dash ] less. ” Wang says the line is broken up because it ’ s a maritime limit. “ It ’ s not like a fixed borderline on down, ” she explains. “ As a scientist, I ’ d say it ’ s impossible to have a fixed molding on the ocean … the waves in the ocean move. ” Wang besides contends that the dot line is a “ identical clear ” watershed between the cryptic ocean that is China ’ mho domain and a Southeast Asia that doesn ’ thyroxine have much in the way of a continental shelf. ( southeast asian nations like Vietnam, which has a long continental shelf, would disagree. ) “ When we made the line, we stressed a human-centered spirit, ” Wang says. “ We allow the adjacent countries to pass through it without obstacles. ” ( In fact, external maritime jurisprudence allows for such theodolite. )
DigitalGlobe overview imagery comparing Fiery Cross Reef from May 31, 2014, to June 3, 2016. Fiery Cross is located in the western depart of the Spratly Islands group .
DigitalGlobe/Getty Images
humanitarian spirit was not shown to Yang, Wang ’ s mentor. Born in 1917 and educated in Britain, Yang was employed by the nationalist government of China. As politicians looked to strengthen a state emerging from war and privation, Yang began cataloguing what the Kuomintang politics claimed were China ’ sulfur maritime treasures. In 1947, he worked on the map introducing the 11-dash line and 286 bits of rock and turf in the South China Sea. Yang helped to officially name each collocate of rock and reef, referring to the territory jointly as the “ South China Sea Islands. ” But two years late, the Nationalists lost to the communists in China ’ s civil war. During the Cultural Revolution, Yang was persecuted as an “ antirevolutionary academic authority ” because of his association with the get the better of nationalists. “ He never talked about the line he made in the South China Sea again, ” says Wang of her academic guidebook ’ s latter years. “ He was treated badly. ” ( Yang died in 2009. ) Wang nurtures early historic grievances. Chairman Mao ’ s decision, through Premier Zhou Enlai, to hand over the Gulf of Tonkin to Vietnam in 1952, thereby removing two of the 11 South China Sea dashes, still rankles. “ It was stupid, ” she says. “ Mao Zedong should not have given it up. ” By contrast, she contends, Mao went to war with India over a border bicker. Why the difference ? “ China was a continental kingdom not a maritime one, ” she says. “ Historically, we did not pay much care to the oceans. ” indeed, after a outburst of seafaring exploration during the Ming dynasty ( 1368-1644 ), China ’ sulfur emperors largely shut their conglomerate off from the seas. As a consequence, Wang says, cartographic proof of China ’ second claims to the South China Sea is barely. “ We had no good maps during the Qing dynasty, ” she says of the imperial age that replaced the Ming and ended in 1911. “ The Qing merely showed the South China Sea as a small lake. ” distillery, like other chinese scholars, Wang contends that plenty of historic evidence supports Beijing ’ s claims of ancient sovereignty over the South China Sea — from pottery shards to navigational handbooks used by chinese fishermen. Of path, other nations that share the waterway, such as Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines, have their own archaeological finds that they say prove their peoples besides roamed the South China Sea. Besides, external maritime convention, to which China is party, pays less heed to history when it comes to deciding claims to the ocean by nonarchipelagic nations .
For decades, chinese schoolchildren have been taught that their fatherland ’ s furthest southerly range was the submerged James Shoal ( known in chinese as Zengmu, a transliteration of “ James ” ), which is located around 50 miles off the coast of Malaysia. Waters around the shallow are home to malaysian petroleum and gas platforms. This geography lesson however, taiwanese maps gave skimp attention to the South China Sea. That began to change after 2009, when a map with the nine-dash line was attached in a submission to the U.N. during a quarrel with Vietnam. today, taiwanese passports are emblazoned with a map with nine dashes through the South China Sea—plus a tenth that ensures Taiwan, to which the Nationalists retreated in 1949, is counted as taiwanese territory.
Read more: Maritime on Audiotree Live (Full Session)
curiously, though, the dashes on the 2009 map ( and on current chinese passports ) are located in slightly different places from those on the master 1947 map. In several cases, the fresh dashes hug the coasts of other Southeast asian nations more closely, giving China an even more expansive claim to the watercourse “ Because the people who made the [ newer ] map were not rigorous, they didn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate follow the right image scale, ” says geographer Wang. “ Some people are not working that rigorously. ” And though China besides makes territorial claims in the East and Yellow Seas, these specks of land are not marked by dot boundaries. Dashes, it appears, are reserved for the South China Sea .
Missile destroyer Guangzhou launches an air-defense projectile during a military use in the body of water area near confederacy China ‘s Hainan Island and Xisha islands on July 8, 2016
Xinhua News Agency—Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images
ultimately, it ’ s not flush clear what the nine-dash line means to China. Is it all water system within the boundary or all territorial features ? For the average chinese, every drop of ocean within the dashes is clearly China ’ randomness. “ The discontinuous line, ” says Wang, “ means the national molding on the sea. ” The geographer clarifies further. “ The dash lines mean the ocean, islands and reefs all belong to China and that China has sovereign rights, ” she says. “ But it ’ sulfur discontinuous, meaning that other countries can pass through the lines freely. ” surely, some of China ’ mho actions seem to support that definition of the line. In 2012, a evanesce of chinese maritime surveillance cutters patrolled the South China Sea in what was dubbed a “ regular rights defense patrol. ” A Chinese state of matter television crew was brought along for function of the ride. Andrew Chubb, a Ph.D. student at University of Western Australia who studies chinese policy on the South China Sea, noted in his research that the path that chinese ships took, which was documented on state television, echoed the nine-dash line. chinese audiences would be left with the natural impression that the scatter limit was the extent of chinese sovereignty. In accession, arsenic recently as 2012, Chinese boats cut seismic cables used for department of energy exploration by Vietnam. The cable-cutting occurred near the westerly extent of the nine-dash production line, again suggesting that these waters were China ’ south .
But external nautical law, which was formed after China ’ south dotted line was created, doesn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate see it that way. tied if China controlled every contested Spratly rock ‘n’ roll and reef — presently Beijing holds a minority of all Spratly features, which they have built into artificial islands — the law of the sea would not give China rights to all waters within the nine-dash line. back in 2014, Wu Shichun, the influential oral sex of the taiwanese government-funded National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told TIME that the nine-dash occupation did not represent a across-the-board claim to all nautical space. “ China has never claimed all waters in the u-shaped line, ” he said. “ From the diachronic archives from Taiwan and China, it ’ mho clear that the argumentation shows ownership of insular features within the u-shaped line. ” A politics argument reacting to the July 12 award may hint that official policy agrees that the line denotes all district within the dashed limit, not all waters. Either way, the fact that ambiguity remains at all proves the complicate bequest of the nine-dash line. meanwhile, tensions remain in the wake up of the July 12 regnant. The Philippines, which lodged the sheath against China with the international court in 2013, had said it would dispatch a former President to Beijing to negotiate on South China Sea issues. But on Tuesday Philippine Foreign Minister Perfecto Yasay told local anesthetic broadcaster ABS-CBN that Beijing ’ s wish not to discuss the international court ’ sulfur sagacity made bilateral talks sturdy. A day earlier, Beijing announced another laid of military drills in the South China Sea, following live-fire action earlier in the month. China is cordoning off part of the South China Sea for war games from July 19 to 21. entrance to these waters by foreign ships, China ’ mho Maritime Safety Administration said, will be “ prohibited. ” — With report by Yang Siqi / Beijing Contact us at letters @ time.com. share THIS STORY
Read more: A Man Quotes Maritime Law To Avoid Ticket
